| Notes |
- Name Suffix: Lord of Duffus
Freskin, whose curious name has been the subject of some speculation. Heis said to have been a person of Flemish origin, whom David I took northwith him from the Lowlands and settled in Moray, when he suppressed aninsurrection of the natives of that province in 1130. From the terms of acharter granted to one of his sons by William the Lion, it would appearthat Freskin held from King David the lands of Strabrok inLinlithgowshire, along with his lands in Moray, but he is nowheredesigned 'Flandrensis' or le Flamyng, as was the custome when Flemingswere mentioned in early charters. It may be, as has been surmised, thathis name is the same as Fresicus, the Low Latin for Friscian, and wastherefore sufficiently distinctive. On the other hand, Freskin may be acorruption of some compund of the Gaelic 'Fear,' with a noun or adjectivedescriptive of some trait of character or physical peculiarity. [TheScots Peerage II:120-121]
Freskin, a person of unknown descent, but who is believed to be ofFlemish origin, upon whom King David I, in pusuance, it is said, of acolonising policy, bestowed wide landed possessions. These includedStrabrock (Uphall and Broxburn), in West Lothian, and the lands ofDuffus, Roseisle, Inchkeil, Macher, and Kintray, forming the larger partof the parish of Duffus and a portion of the modern parish of Spynie,between Elgin and the Moray Firth. At least Freskin is said to have heldthese lands of King David I, for Freskin himself is named only once, in acharter granted to his son William, between 1166 and 1171, by KingWilliam the Lion, which confirms the lands named as having been held byFreskin. Freskin therefore must have died before 1166. According to theeditor of the 'Registrum Moraviense,' followed by Sir William Fraser inhis 'Sutherland Book,' he had three sons, Hugh, who was the ancestor ofthe Sutherland family, William of Duffus, and Andrew, a churchman. ButHugh, son of Freskin, is only named once, in a writ dated between 1147and 1150, and that in such circumstance as to make the evidenceuntrustworthy, while Andrew is clearly identical with a namesake of laterdate. The weight of testimony rather points to the probability thatFreskin had only one son, a view already adopted by Lord Hailes andGeorge Chalmers. Shaw, in his 'History of Moray,' also assigns to Freskinonly one son. [The Scots Peerage VIII:319-320]
|